Current:Home > InvestHow fast can the auto industry go electric? Debate rages as the U.S. sets new rules-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
How fast can the auto industry go electric? Debate rages as the U.S. sets new rules
View Date:2024-12-23 20:22:33
For car policy wonks, the Environmental Protection Agency's proposed new vehicle standards are this summer's hot blockbuster.
The surprisingly ambitious proposal unveiled earlier this year could mean that up to 67% of new vehicles sold by 2032 would need to be electric in order for carmakers to be in compliance. That would be a major step toward cutting U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.
Public comments on the EPA proposal closed on Wednesday, and the reviews have poured in.
"Vital," says one environmental group. "Feasible," says the electric vehicle lobby. "Neither reasonable nor achievable," say traditional automakers.
It's not just the auto industry weighing in. The ski industry — which is feeling the effects of climate change — has embraced the rule. The oil industry has vehemently objected to it, with the American Petroleum Institute warning it "will keep all options on the table" if it's finalized.
Accelerating a transition underway
A lot is at stake, and the EPA's rule is widely expected to be challenged in court, just as the current standards have been. The agency has previously indicated it planned to finalize the rule by March 2024.
Automakers are already moving to embrace electric vehicles, and the federal government has offered many billions of dollars in incentives to speed up that process.
If those incentives are a giant carrot, these proposed regulations are a sizable stick.
Unlike California and other states that require a certain percentage of new car sales be electric, the EPA would not set a direct mandate for electric vehicles.
However, the proposed standards for greenhouse gas emissions and pollution would be so low that to meet them across an entire fleet, automakers would almost certainly have to build large numbers of zero-emission vehicles. The EPA says that would save lives and save Americans a up to a trillion dollars on gasoline.
Vehicle standards are a complicated dance between regulators and industry. The government wants to set standards that are achievable, but not easy. Companies want standards that give them plenty of room to make profits.
Big automakers say the timeline is too fast
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, the trade group representing big, traditional automakers, is lobbying for less stringent standards, pointing out that many elements of the transition to EVs — from beefing up the electric grid for chargers to having more raw materials for batteries — are outside of the direct control of carmakers.
The group is asking the EPA to aim for a lower percentage of car sales to be EVs by 2032, and to extend some "flexibilities" in how emissions and emissions credits are calculated; essentially, both lowering the target and giving companies more ways to hit it.
The group is also pushing for less stringent pollution standards on gas- and diesel-powered vehicles, arguing that if companies are supposed to be switching to EVs they'll have less money to invest in making internal combustion vehicles cleaner.
The group notes that automakers have embraced the overall goal of electrification, and the debate now is about the timeline. "If the Environmental Protection Agency were to address every solution we've outlined, this would still be by far the most aggressive regulation ever promulgated," John Bozzella, the president of the Alliance, said.
In their comments, the trade group also questions whether the EPA has the authority to set such ambitious standards. The auto industry has previously defended the EPA's right to set standards and encourage electrification, but says the scale of change imagined by the current standards is "unprecedented."
EV companies say it's doable
Meanwhile the Zero Emission Transportation Association, a much newer trade group representing Tesla and other all-electric automakers as well as charger companies and EV suppliers, is asking the EPA to impose even more stringent rules.
The group says that stringent rules are not only important for public health and the fight against climate change, but also create U.S. jobs — many government incentives for EVs require U.S. or North American manufacturing — while providing the "regulatory certainty" that suppliers and utilities need.
That is, if automakers are going to be required to make EVs quickly, other companies can more confidently build factories for parts or invest in chargers, investments that might only pay off when a high percentage of cars are electric.
"We believe these standards are achievable," ZETA president Albert Gore III wrote.
The group compared the switch to EVs to the phasing out of leaded gasoline, encouraging the EPA to act with comparable urgency.
veryGood! (36)
Related
- Seattle man faces 5 assault charges in random sidewalk stabbings
- A Teenage Floridian Has Spent Half His Life Involved in Climate Litigation. He’s Not Giving Up
- Netflix has officially begun its plan to make users pay extra for password sharing
- After Unprecedented Heatwaves, Monsoon Rains and the Worst Floods in Over a Century Devastate South Asia
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, 4G
- Trisha Paytas Responds to Colleen Ballinger Allegedly Sharing Her NSFW Photos With Fans
- More shows and films are made in Mexico, where costs are low and unions are few
- Texas Activists Sit-In at DOT in Washington Over Offshore Oil Export Plans
- Jason Kelce Jokes He Got “Mixed Reviews” From Kylie Kelce Over NSFW Commentary
- Yes, Puerto Rican licenses are valid in the U.S., Hertz reminds its employees
Ranking
- Oprah Winfrey denies being paid $1M for Kamala Harris rally: 'I was not paid a dime'
- Ubiquitous ‘Forever Chemicals’ Increase Risk of Liver Cancer, Researchers Report
- In a historic step, strippers at an LA bar unionize
- As EPA’s Region 3 Administrator, Adam Ortiz Wants the Mid-Atlantic States to Become Climate-Conscious and Resilient
- NFL MVP rankings: Does Steelers QB Russell Wilson deserve any consideration?
- As EPA’s Region 3 Administrator, Adam Ortiz Wants the Mid-Atlantic States to Become Climate-Conscious and Resilient
- Can Africa Grow Without Fossil Fuels?
- Federal inquiry details abuses of power by Trump's CEO over Voice of America
Recommendation
-
Trump on Day 1: Begin deportation push, pardon Jan. 6 rioters and make his criminal cases vanish
-
A lot of offices are still empty — and it's becoming a major risk for the economy
-
Disney World is shutting down its $2,500-a-night Star Wars-themed hotel
-
Overwhelmed by Solar Projects, the Nation’s Largest Grid Operator Seeks a Two-Year Pause on Approvals
-
PSA: Coach Outlet Has Stocking Stuffers, Gifts Under $100 & More for the Holidays RN (up to 60% Off)
-
Mauricio Umansky Shares Family Photos With Kyle Richards After Addressing Breakup Speculation
-
Celebrity Esthetician Kate Somerville Is Here To Improve Your Skin With 3 Simple Hacks
-
California Released a Bold Climate Plan, but Critics Say It Will Harm Vulnerable Communities and Undermine Its Goals